Co-Intelligence Logo The Co-Intelligence Institute
Home
What's New
Search THE INSTITUTE Who We Are
Co-Intelligence
Our Work
Projects
Contact RESOURCES Don't Miss (Features)
Articles
Topics
Books
Links JOIN US Subscribe
Take Action
Donate Legal Notices

 

Outcomes of Public Participation

ref: Designing Multi-Process Public Participation Programs

A FIRST CONSIDERATION
IN DESIGNING MULTI-PROCESS DIALOGUE AND DELIBERATION PROGRAMS

POSSIBLE OUTCOMES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

As we know, means should be selected to serve ends. As we become more conscious and intentional about the outcomes of public participation programs, we can better choose processes and approaches that serve those ends (see, for example, Appendices A  and B).

Widely diverse rationales exist for public participation programs. Sometimes there is a desire to inform the public or to get feedback on existing proposals. Sometimes there is a desire to help the public engage together in powerfully co-creative citizenship. I personally am interested in bringing latent community wisdom to bear on public policy.

Regardless of personal or situational preferences here, it is in everyone's interests to be able to consider a full range of possible outcomes in the very earliest stages of public participation planning. If outcomes are considered first, it is very likely that multiple process programs will be recognized as necessary to satisfy the full range of desired outcomes.

The initial list below is far from comprehensive, but I hope it will serve as a stimulant toward creating an expanding list of outcome options useful to everyone involved. Please wonder as you read it: What possible desirable public participation outcomes are missing here? Note your answers and add them to the dialogue about this..

Note that the categories into which I have clustered the outcomes are only a rough initial take on how these various potential outcomes might be grouped. So they, too, are subject to modification.

AN INITIAL LIST OF POSSIBLE DESIRABLE OUTCOMES OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION

Input Outcomes

Citizens have given input to officials.
Officials know better what citizens think and feel.
Participating citizens have chosen from among options provided to them by officials.
Public judgment has shaped public policy, public opinion and/or public behaviors.

Participation Outcomes

There has been opportunity for all interested people to participate.
Interest groups feel their voices have been heard.
Lots of citizens feel that their voices have been heard.
Some citizens have had a direct and intense experience of citizenship.
Everyone involved -- including citizens generally -- feel the process has been fair.
The public believes there has been public involvement.

Social Consensus Outcomes

People have been educated about the issues.
Citizens have come to agree with the policies officials want to pursue.
Diverse sectors in the community are "on the same page."
The community is generally and broadly aware that a participatory process has been happening.
Thousands or millions of citizens have had a vicarious experience of intense citizenship.
The community feels like it has spoken, like "We the People" have spoken.
The process offers potential for ongoing collective learning by the whole community.

Diversity Outcomes

The diversity of the forum has been considered adequate by the community and/or the relevant stakeholder groups
Conflict in the community has been addressed and there is more mutual understanding.
The diversity in the community -- or around the issue -- has been used creatively.

Quality of Output Outcomes

The public is impressed with the quality of the solutions.
Realistic solutions have been chosen that can be readily implemented within the scope of existing institutions and players.
Recommendations have been developed that can demonstrate measurable results within a few months or years.
People have been motivated into actions or behaviors that will serve the common good.
Imaginative solutions and perspectives have been found that excite people to move beyond what has been done before.
Public policies and programs have resulted that prove to have long-term, broadly beneficial impacts acknowledged by the whole community.
The community's capacity for successful self-governance or self-organization has been enhanced.


If you have comments about this site, email cii@igc.org.
Contents copyright © 2003, all rights reserved, with generous permissions policy (see Legal Notices)